| |
|
St
Martin, South Raynham
 |
|
The
setting of this pretty little church is just
about perfect, on the edge of the Raynham estate
and set away from the nearest road, with the old
Rectory next door and copses and fields for
company. At the entrance to the graveyard is a
wrought iron kissing gate, of a type which must
once have been common, put together by some
long-dead village blacksmith. As at the other
Raynhams, the graveyard is still full of
fascinating old headstones, with none of the
modern fashion for tidying up in the name of
motor mowers. The windows of the church are a
delight, like a pattern book of the later
medieval period. The simplicity of the tower
belies the fact that this whole structure is
probably a rebuilding of the 14th century,
embellished in the late 15th. |
St Martin
has the feel of a proper rural church. Here, there are no
outstanding treasures, but there is much of interest, and
an atmosphere which speaks of the long generations who
have seen it as the heart of their community. It is a
touchstone.
Perhaps
the most outstanding feature is the surviving mensa, or
altar stone, now in place back on the altar. For many
years, it served as a step into the chancel. The pattern
on the edge is older than the building in which you see
it. Pevsner thought it might be 12th century, but it may
be older, and is certainly at the end of the Norman
period, if not earlier. This makes it the oldest
surviving mensa in East Anglia, and one of the oldest in
England.

This is a
rustic estate church, without the memorials to famous
names which you find across the fields at East Raynham.
Here, it is easy to imagine the blacksmith and the
plowboy sitting uncomfortably for the afternoon sermon,
and even further back in Catholic days the village women
at their private devotions. I stood in the silence, the
birdsong from outside a counterpoint to the sunshine
falling through the windows. I thought of Eliot: If you came this way, taking any route,
starting from anywhere, at any time or at any season, it
would always be the same: you would have to put off sense
and notion. You are not here to verify, instruct
yourself, or inform curiosity or carry report. You are
here to kneel where prayer has been valid.
One of the
delights of this part of Norfolk is that, apart from the
jarring exception of the two aptly-named Weasenham
churches, virtually all the churches around here are open
and welcoming. It feels like a privilege to come into one
and sit in its silence for a while, a reminder that the
old buildings are the greatest act of witness which the
Church of England has got. I wonder how many people who
slake their thirst for a sense of the numinous, and fill
the God-shaped hole within themselves, do so by starting
with a visit to a place like this?
It has been eight years since I
began the websites for the Churches of East Anglia, and
throughout that time I have promoted the cause of open
churches, seeing it as one of the primary reasons for the
existence of these buildings. I am proud that many more
churches are open in Suffolk than were a decade ago, and
although I think there are several reasons for this, I am
pleased when people tell me that my websites may be one
of them.
However, in the last year or so
that I have begun to have some small doubts - not about
the need for open churches, of course, but about what I
have begun to see as a rather horrible militant
anti-religious feeling in this country, fed by the
cynicism of celebrity culture, a poorly educated
understanding of Islam and Catholicism in particular, and
the often articulate champions of the neo-fascist
television philosopher Richard Dawkins. What forms might
this anti-Christian sentiment begin to take?
| Several times this year in
Norfolk I have encountered acts of vandalism
which were clearly not the work of kids, or
football hooligans, or organised burglars, but
simply attacks on churches because they were
places of worship. Increasingly, BBC Radio and
broadsheet newspapers have featured writers with
extreme views on the subject of belief, including
a promotion of Dawkins' idea that religion is a
mental illness, and that bringing up a child in
the Christian Faith is a form of child abuse. I
fear that the attacks I have already witnessed
will not be the last. Churches
like St Martin are a part of our cultural and
social inheritance. I can only hope that they
remain open to us for as long as we need them,
and certainly for longer than we deserve.
|
|
 |
|
|
|