| |
|
St Mary,
Little Fransham
 |
|
St
Mary is a reclusive delight. You probably won't
find it without a map. It is set in a secluded
graveyard set back from the Mileham road. There
is no sign on the road, and there is no tower to
poke tellingly above the treetops. But if you can
find it you'll be rewarded by a delciously
ramshackle building, the chancel higher than the
nave and a 15th century porch topped with a
redbrick upper storey. This has the date 1743
worked into the ends of the braces. It replaced a
tower which fell about fifty years earlier. St Mary is
one of those welcoming, open churches you find so
many of in the area between Dereham and Fakenham.
There is nothing tremendously exciting here, just
a lovely little rural church.
|
The window
tracery is mostly Decorated, but the 13th century doorway
and font illustrate the true age of the walls. The font
is a fine example of the ideas buzzing about as Norman
developed into Early English: still square, but with the
arcading that would shortly become fashionable on
octagonal fonts.
The royal
arms of George III are some of the best in the county, on
a tall wooden board with the arms set on a pedestal in
what I believe is called a full achievement. There is
some good old woodwork, including tracery-backed benches
in the chancel. But most pleasing of all, perhaps, are
the roofs, with arch-braced hammerbeams in the nave and
tie-beam braces in the chancel.
To finish,
a puzzle. The splendidly named Hamond Alpe was High
Sheriff of Norfolk in 1758. He was candid, humane and
generous to his neighbours, indulgent to
his family and affectionately tender to his
wife. We know this, because his memorial on the narrow
south-east nave wall tells us so. It also tells us that
he died with Christian submission in 1767. It is
a fine memorial; not spectacular, but carefully crafted
with dignity and taste. But there is a poignant addendum
to it, for almost forty years later the bottom plate was
crudely inscribed to record the death of his wife. There
is no eulogy here, no exposition of her qualities. Even
the scrollwork looks as if it was done by a child. It
looks the work of 150 years earlier, it is so primitive.
What happened? Had forty years of widowhood removed her
from a sphere where she might be remembered decently? Had
the family fallen so far that this was the only memorial
she could merit or afford?
Simon Knott, May 2006
|
|
|