| |
|
St James,
Great Ellingham Here we are in the agricultural heartland of
south Norfolk, in the rolling fields between Norwich and
Thetford. Attleborough is just a couple of miles off, but
otherwise Great Ellingham is the largest village among
its neighbours.
In this
part of Norfolk, it's actually quite unusual to find a
parish church with a village spread around it. Great
Ellingham is big enough to feel like a proper place, and
was once a substantial parish. At the 1841 census the
village had over a thousand people, and could support two
pubs, two beer houses, two bakers and a butcher, as well
as three blacksmiths, two wheelwrights and a shoemaker.
In common
with much of the rest of rural Norfolk, the population
has declined since then, of course. The advent of
supermarkets and the internal combustion engine has seen
off all the tradesmen. But the large church still sits in
its wide graveyard surrounded by attractive houses. St
James is the Lord of all it surveys.
 |
|
The church is
typical of larger East Anglian churches
in that it has a long nave and chancel,
aisles and a clerestory. But what you see
is essentially a church of the early 14th
century, the Decorated period, with a
spire of wood and lead; East Anglia has
generally got more Perpendicular work,
from a century or so later. The reason
for this prominence of later architecture
is that the increased prosperity of the
region in the years after the Black
Death, and the renewed sense of mortality
that the pestilence encouraged, led to
vast amounts of New Money being spent on
church rebuilds. The Black Death carried off
about half the population of Norfolk. But
this devastation was not evenly spread;
the very young and the very old bore the
brunt of the disease; more people died in
cities than in the countryside, and the
poor suffered more than the rich.
However, the rich did suffer,
and the old landed estates were broken up
where an owner died and no heir survived.
A rising merchant class pounced on the
chance to buy land, and the status that
went with it.
|
|
| The new owners rapidly
became the ruling class. But there was still the
problem of death, especially when it comes like a
thief in the night. The newly wealthy had to
ensure that the poor of the parish would pray for
their souls if they met an untimely end. A big
new in-yer-face church was the best way of doing
this. Perhaps the new rich themselves felt
insecure. Asserting their position in stone and
bricks must have helped their self-image. And
there was also a need to enforce control over the
imagination of the parishioners, because the
naturally conservative East Anglians did not
always take kindly to the parvenus of
the newly moneyed, just as we did not easily warm
to vulgar Thatcherism half a millennium later. |
|
 |
 |
|
But St James was not
rebuilt. However, we should not assume that this
was because the parish was unusally poor in the
15th century, or that the old order had not
changed, or that there was no wealthy benefactor.
It may simply be that the exterior was already so
fine that all the money was spent inside on
furnishings. The most
singular aspect of the exterior is the
chequerwork. This is a decorative design whereby
large square blocks of knapped flint alternate
with square blocks of stone. Most famously in
East Anglia, it decorates the mighty church at
Southwold. Here at Great Ellingham it is finer on
the north side than on the south. Perhaps the
best view of all is from the north-east corner of
the graveyard, from where you can see both the
chequerwork and the glorious east window with its
flowing tracery.
|
| Seeing such a grand
exterior, you may fear an overwhelming
Victorianisation of the interior. Bigger churches
tended to be in poor condition by the 19th
century after long years of neglect, and the
Victorians could often not resist imposing a
grand, urban, anonymous interior on these large
country churches, quite out of keeping with the
character and history of the building. A good, or
perhaps that should be bad, example of that kind
of thing around here is a few miles off at Hingham. However,
do not fear. St James has the great benefit of an
interior which is at once wholly rustic and
grand, a difficult combination that always takes
the breath away when it works. It does here.
|
|
 |
The tall, unbroken
nave and chancel are bright and open beneath rank upon
rank of ancient beams. A 15th century arch-braced roof
crowns the nave, and there is one of the late 18th
century in the chancel, which looks as if it has been
hewn out of rough timber. Best of all, you can climb to
the ringers gallery beneath the tower to see it all at
close quarters, and to gaze eastwards through a forest of
beams. The great east window carries the eye onwards, and
fills the building with light. Cautley didn't think much
of the chancel roof, but it has great character,
particularly the way that the carpenter supported it by
carrying the uprights over the clerestory windows.
Judging by the position of the corbels, this must always
have been the case.
Back on
the ground, modern chairs and simple furnishings create a
welcoming feeling; despite the mystical architecture,
this is a friendly place. The font, with shields in
lozenges, is 14th century and must be contemporary with
the grand rebuilding of the time. It is kept full of holy
water to act as a stoup, and this combined with the smell
of incense might give you a sense of the character of the
worship here.
 |
|
The
wide aisles are a pleasant place to wander, not
least because they are home to a variety of
medieval survivals and some fine 20th century
work, a happy combination. The lack of 19th
century glass means that they are filled with
light. Indeed, you would be hard pressed to find
anything of the 19th century at all here, which
shows considerable skill and sleight of hand on
the part of the Victorians, since the layout of
the interior here is certainly a 19th century
reinvention of its medieval past. During the 17th
and 18th centuries, St James was more of a
preaching house than a sacramental space. Perhaps the
most interesting survivals are the wall
paintings. There is a large image niche near to
the east end of the south aisle that was once
part of the shrine to Our Lady of Ellingham. It
is painted in rich greens and reads, and includes
angels in exquisite detail at the top. A piscina
on the far side of the window embrasure is
contemporary with it.
|
A more
interesting painting is at the west end of the aisle. It
shows, or appears to show, a traveller with a pilgrim
staff approaching a preaching cross, while on the far
side a creature with a tail walks away. The pilgrim
figure has been variously interpreted as St James or St
Christopher, neither of which is wholly satisfactory.
This painting reminds me of the boss in the porch at
Norwich St Stephen which depicts a cloaked figure, and a
preaching cross, and what may be a devil. The boss has
also never been satisfactorily explained.
In the
north aisle, the entrance to the rood loft stairs shows
that the screen stretched right the way across the
church, and must have been very impressive indeed,
especially in such a high space. Very little of it
survives. A few bays of the dado cordon off the chapel of
Our Lady in the south aisle, and there are some more
panels at the west end of that aisle near to the south
door.
| As
I said, there is very little coloured glass here,
but what there is is fine. St James in the south
aisle dates from the 1920s (he looks more recent)
and this window depicts the legend of Santiago
de Compostella, St James of the Field of
Stars. As Mortlock points out, the artist didn't
realise that in the Legend of St James the boat
traditionally arrives without sails, but never
mind. I said that this church is both
rustic and grand, but it is not a grandness which
depends on the patronage of a landed family.
There are very few memorials, and these are
mostly understated. Even the church's only brass,
up in the chancel, is a simple yet lovely lady
wearing a rather ordinary head dress and gown.
She is believed to be Anne Conners, and to date
from about 1500.
|
|
 |
The church
of St James is a good example of the way that centuries
of both care and neglect can conspire to produce
something organically beautiful, a building that feels
loved and used, abounding in character all of its own. I
liked it a lot, and will certainly come back.
Simon Knott, January 2006
|
|
|